Economic assessment of coral reef ecosystems in Bajo Gurapin waters, Kayoa district, South Halmahera
Abstract
Coral reefs are one of the most productive and most diverse coastal ecosystem. This ecosystem is the habitat of marine biota such as reef fish, molluscs, crustacea, seaweed, marine plants and so on that use this place as a place to breed, look for food and protection (Romimohtarto, 1991). Coral reef ecosystems are one of the natural resources, where coastal communities benefit from these resources. This study aims to determine the shape of coral reefs (lifeform) and the percentage of coral reefs, and to estimate the economic benefits of coral reef ecosystems in the waters of Bajo-Guruapin Village, Kayoa District, South Halmahera Regency, North Maluku Province. in the waters of Bajo - Guruapin are Acropora Branching (ACB), Acropora Submassive (ACS), Acropora Tabulate (ACT), Coral Branching (CB), Coral Encrusthing (CE), Coral Massive (CM), Coral Foliose (CF), Coral Submassive (CS) and Soft Coral (SC). From the results of the analysis, the percentage of coral cover ranged from 35.65 to 74.42% consisting of hard corals and soft corals so that the condition of coral reefs in Bajo - Guruapin waters can be categorized as conditions up to good.
References
Bakosuturnal. 2005. Pedoman Penyusunan Neraca dan Valuasi Sumberdaya Alam Pesisir dan Lautan.
Bengen D.G. 2001.Sinopsis Ekosistem dan Sumberdaya Alam Pesisir. Pusat Kajian Sumberdaya Pesisir dan Lautan, Instititut Pertanian Bogor.
[BPS]. 2010. Kecamatan Kayoa Dalam Angka. Badan Pusat Statistik Kecamatan Kayoa. Guruapin.
[BPS]. 2010. Provinsi Maluku Utara Dalam Angka. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Maluku Utara.
Cesar, H. 2000. Collected Essay on the Economics of Coral Reefs. Cardio Departemen Biology and enviromental science, Kalmar University. Sweden.
Dahuri R. 2003. Keanekaragaman Hayati Laut: Aset Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Indonesia. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta
Dixon, J. A. 1998. Economic values of coral Reefs. What Are The Issues?. In Coral Reefs: Chalanges and Oppurtunities for Suistainable Management. The World Bank, Washington DC.
Fauzi A. 2000. Persepsi Terhadap Nilai Eknomi Sumerdaya. “Bahan Pelatihan Untuk Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Pesisir dan Lautan”. Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang: 4-8 Maret.
Fauzi A. 2004. Ekonomi Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan. Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta. Gramedia.
Fauzi A. 2009. Aspek Ekonomi Ekosistem Lamun. Makalah disampaikan pada Lokakarya Nasional I Pengelolaan Ekosistem Lamun, 18 November 2009, Sheraton Media Jakarta
Fauzi A dan S Anna, 2005. Pemodelan Sumber Daya Perikanan dan Kelautan. Jakarta. Gramedia.
Harsani H, 2013. Valuasi Ekonomi Ekosistem Terumbu Karang di Perairan Kota Tidore Kepulauan. Tesis Program Pascasarjana Universitas Hasanuddin.
Irham dkk, 2014. Sumber Daya Alam di Pesisir Desa Guruapin dan Desa Bajo Maluku Utara. (Penprinas MP3EI 2011-2015)
Keputusan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup No. 01 Tahun 2001. Tentang kriteria baku kerusakan terumbu karang.
Kordi, K.M.G.H. 2010. Sukses Budidaya Ikan Baronang di Tambak dan Keramba Jaring Apung. Lily Publisher
Laporan Penduduk Kecamamatan Kayoa : Tahun 2017.
Nybakken J.W. 1988. Biologi Laut Suatu Pendekatan Ekologis. Gramedia, Jakarta.
Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Desa (RPJM-Desa) Tahun 2017-2018. Desa Bajo Kecamatan Kayoa Kabupaten Halmahera Selatan
Suparmoko M dkk, 2007. Panduan Valuasi Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan
Suparmoko M dkk, 2004. Valuasi Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alam Kabupaten Sikka. Proceeding Natural Resources and Environmental Accounting. BPFE-MASLI, Buku 2.
Yaping, D. 1999. The Value of Improved Water Quality for Recreation in East Lake, Wuhan China. EEPSEA, Singapore
Copyright (c) 2021 Iwan Hi. Kader, M. Said Alhaddad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
