EFL Students’ Perception in Learning English Subject at SMA Negeri 9 Tidore Kepulauan

  • Nurlaily Sofyan Dosen Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara
  • Rizal Soleman Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara
Keywords: Perception, Learning, English Subject

Abstract

Abstract:It is a known fact that English plays a predominant role in the field of education all over the world, and itis used as the common language in the interaction of ELF members who are from diverse cultures and linguistic backgrounds.So, that is why there are many reasons for the student to study English and it is depend on their own perception.The objective of this research is to know the EFL students‟ perception on learning English at SMA Negeri 9 Tidore Kepulauan.This research used qualitative method because it talks about the analysis of EFL students‟ perception on the learning English.Ithas been doneon August 2020. The subject of research is the second grade students of SMA Negeri 9 Tidore Kepulauanlocated in the village of Mafututu, East Tidore district. And, data Analysis employ percentage formula. After present research findings and discussion, the authors drawn the conclusions thatthe EFL students‟ perception on learning English subject is in the good category. The result of this study can be proved by students‟ answer of questionnaire provided shows that the average score from twenty students at SMA Negeri 9 Tidore Kepulauan was 63% which is categorized in the level of good

References

Algeo, Jhon. 2005. Problem to the Origins and Development English Language. Cambridge: Cengage Learning.

Arikunto, S. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta:

PT. Rineka Cipta.Arikunto, S. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta:PT. Rineka Cipta.

Asrori, M. 2009. Psikologi Remaja Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Atkinson, R.L., Atkinson, R.C., Hilgard, E.R. 1991. Pengantar Psikologi, Edisi Delapan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Brown 2007prinsip pembelajaran dan Bahasa,Edisi Kelima.Jakarta:Kedutaan Besar Amerika Serikat di Jakarta.

Chaplin, J.P. 2011. Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. (Diterjemahkan Oleh Kartono K). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Crystal, 1980. What is linguistik.Third Edition:Camdridge University.

Crystal, 2001. An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Language and Languages. Second Edition. London: Penguin Books

Denzine and Lincoln, 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Devito, Joshep A. 2011. Komunikasi antar Manusia. Pemulang-Tanggerang Selatan: Karisma Publishing Group.

Elliot, S. (2004) Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ginting, Abdurahman. 2008. Esensi Praktis Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Humaniora.

Hamka, Muhammad. 2002. Hubungan Antara Persepsi Terhadap Penaasan Kerja Dengan Motivasi Berprestasi. Surakarta. Universitas Muhammadyah Fakultas Psikologi.

Maramis, W.F. 2008. Catatan Ilmu Kedokteran Jiwa. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Mar‟at, 1991. Sikap Manusia Serta Perubahannya. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Miles, M, B, Huberman, A, M, 1994. Qualitative data analysis 2 ed. USE:

Moeliono, Anton M. 1988. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: BalaiPustaka.

Moscowitz, M.J., and Orgel, A.R. 1969. General Psycholog : A Core In Human Behavior. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Phusit, N., & Suksiripakonchai, W. (2018). A Study of Thai University Students ‟ Attitudes t owards Pronunciation Models in English as a Lingua Franca. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2018.8.1.927

Purwodarminta, W.J.S. 1990. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: BalaiPustaka.

Rahmat, J. 1990. Psikologi Komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya. Offset.

RAO, P. S. (2019). Research Journal Of English. Research Journal Of English, 845(1), 65–79.

Riduwan. 2009. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. bandung: Alfabeta.

Ruch, Floyd L. 1967. Psychology and Life, 7 Edt. Scott. Atlanta: Foresman and Company.

Sarwono, Wawan. 1983. Sikap dan Perilaku Manusia. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika. Slameto, 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cpita.

Skinner, B.F. 1985. Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan.

Sobur, Alex. 2009. Psykologi Umum. Bandng: Pustaka Setia.

Stone and Nelson, 1985 Educational psychology: The Developmentof Teaching Skills. Massachusetts: Addision Wesley Publishing Company.

Sudaryanto. 1992. Metode Lingustik ke Arah Memahami Metode Lingustik. Cetakan ke-3. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Sugiyono. 2012. Memahami Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sunaryo, 2004. Psikologi Untuk Pendidikan. Jakarta : EGC.

Stephen P. Robbins. 2003. Organizational Behavior Second Edition, Translation. Jakarta: PT. Indeks kelompok Gramedia.

Syah, Muhibbin. 2002. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Trask, R.L.1999. Key Concepts in Language and Linguistik.London:Routledge.

Triatno dan Titik Triwulan, T. 2006. Tinjauan Yuridis Serta Kewajiban Pendidik

Menurut UU Guru dan Dosen: Suatu Kerangka. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka 16 September 2005.

Wagner, Jhon A. And Hollenbeck, Jhon R. 1995. Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage. New York: Routledge.

Walgito, Bimo. 1997. Pengantar PsikoPlogi Umum. Andi Ofset. Yogyakarta.

Walgito, Bimo. 1990. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Andi Ofset. Yogyakarta

Wibowo. 2001. Manajemen Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utara.

Widayatun, T.R. 2009. Ilmu Perilaku. M.A. 104. Jakarta: CV. Agung Seto.

Winkel, W.S. 1992. Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Yosep, I. 2013. Keperawatan Jiwa. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama

Published
2021-03-01
How to Cite
Sofyan, N., & Soleman, R. (2021). EFL Students’ Perception in Learning English Subject at SMA Negeri 9 Tidore Kepulauan. EDU Journal - English Department of UMMU Journal, 1(1), 20 - 30. https://doi.org/10.52046/edu.j.v1i1.676